Our most recent work includes:
Briefing on BP in Iraq
From war to warming: the shameful story of BP in Iraq was released in response to BP’s sponsorship of the ‘I am Ashurbanipal’ exhibition at the British Museum, which features objects from what is now Iraq.
To see an online version, go to the Behind the Logos Iraq page.
To download a printable pdf please click here.
A group that includes leading scientists, representatives of impacted communities and young people lodged this formal complaint to the Science Museum in July 2018 over its relationships with three oil companies.
Behind the Logos: 9 reasons oil sponsors don’t belong in a museum
Also in July 2018 we launched this new website to bring together the core arguments and evidence against oil sponsorship, using numerous case studies to highlight oil companies’ involvement in corruption, pollution and links to human rights violations. Many organisations have contributed, including DeSmog UK, Global Witness, Oil Change International, Medact, Platform and Art Not Oil.
Crude Connections: Mapping BP’s influence from the British Museum to Russia
In January 2018 we exposed the disturbing web of Crude Connections between BP, Putin, Russian oil, British Ministers, human rights abuses and the cultural institutions that the oil giant sponsors. It included a detailed timeline of government meetings, emails and sponsored events, illustrated with extracts of material released under the Freedom of Information Act.
Ethical sponsorship for cultural organisations
In September 2017 we published this online resource aimed at helping cultural organisations define ethical sponsorship, develop and strengthen their ethical fundraising policies and processes, understand best practice and unpack some of the issues surrounding this crucial but controversial area.
Formal complaint to the National Portrait Gallery
In June 2017 we lodged a detailed complaint, alleging that BP’s human rights record breaches the Gallery’s own ethics rules. At the same time, we published a new report, ‘Bad Company’, which shone a spotlight on BP’s close ties to rights-violating regimes around the world including Azerbaijan, Egypt, Indonesia and Mexico.
Fossil Free Tickets
In May 2017 we launched and continue to administer the Fossil Free £5 Ticket scheme which crowdfunds £5 tickets for 16-25-year-olds to see Royal Shakespeare Company plays as an alternative to the BP-sponsored official scheme. It is supported by many big names in the theatre world
Who really pays for BP’s sponsorship?
In May 2017 we collaborated with Oil Change International to launch a new infographic, Who really pays for BP’s sponsorship?, It highlighted the scale of BP’s payments to the arts and taxpayers’ contributions to the institutions that BP sponsors, and showed that both are dwarfed by the £210 million of taxpayers’ money BP received in government subsidies in 2015.
Summary: our campaigns and research work
Our current research work focuses on three main areas:
- Investigating the nature and scale of relationships that exist between fossil fuel companies and cultural institutions in the UK
- Exploring the ways in which those relationships conflict with the values of cultural institutions or breach internal and/or external governance and ethics policies and standards
- Researching and collating new information on the impacts of the fossil fuel companies that sponsor museums and galleries and building links with communities and organisations working on those impacts
This research informs our campaigns work which has included:
- Developing and mobilising networks of cultural, scientific, academic and political figures to speak out in favour of ending oil sponsorship
- Exposing how the values of fossil fuel companies and cultural institutions are not aligned, and bringing ethical scrutiny to bear on oil sponsorship deals
- Highlighting ‘the bigger picture’ and envisioning how a sustainable arts sector is possible without fossil fuel funding
In depth: Formal complaint and report on BP’s human rights record
Ahead of the announcement of the BP Portrait Award on Tuesday 20th June 2017, we issued a formal complaint to the National Portrait Gallery, alleging BP’s human rights record breaches the Gallery’s own ethics rules.
- On the eve of the BP Portrait Award announcement, we made the Gallery’s Ethical Fundraising Policy public for the first time
- We published a new report which shone a spotlight on BP’s close ties to rights violating regimes around the world including Azerbaijan, Egypt, Indonesia and Mexico
- The formal complaint set out how the recent BP sponsorship deal breached the Gallery’s clause on human rights and called for BP to be dropped
You can get the full details of the formal complaint and view our report, ‘Bad Company – BP, human rights and corporate crimes’ here.
In depth: Fossil Free Tickets
On the 31st May 2017, we launched ‘Fossil Free £5 Tickets‘, an ethical crowdfunded alternative to the Royal Shakespeare Company’s BP-sponsored £5 ticket scheme for 16-25 year olds. Backed by over 30 leading figures from the theatre sector, it demonstrates the strength of feeling against BP’s sponsorship of the RSC and highlights that alternative ways of funding discounted tickets exist.
In depth: Work on behalf of Art Not Oil
Prior to the formation of Culture Unstained, we undertook research and campaigns work on behalf of the Art Not Oil coalition which has significantly shaped the debate around oil sponsorship of the arts.
In April 2016, nearly 100 actors, artists, scientists and policy-makers signed a letter calling on the British Museum’s new director, Hartwig Fischer, to abandon the museum’s relationship with BP. The letter was published in The Guardian as part of a full-page article on the wider debate on oil sponsorship. The signatories included Oscar winning actor and director, Mark Rylance, former Chief Scientific Advisor the President of the European Commission, Professor Anne Glover, and bestselling author, Margaret Atwood.
- Key coverage: The Guardian, The Times, The Telegraph
BP’s Cultural Sponsorship: A Corrupting Influence was an extensive report published in May 2016 which drew upon hundreds of documents disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act. It outlined the numerous ways in which BP had sought to influence the museums and galleries it sponsors and use its sponsorship deals as a strategic tool for advancing its business interests, primarily the continued extraction of fossil fuels.
- Key coverage: The Guardian, BBC World Business Report
Did the British Museum break its own rules in renewing BP deal? was published in September 2016 and laid out the flaws in the British Museum’s decision-making process which led to the approval of a new sponsorship deal with BP. Specifically, it highlighted the lack of involvement by the museum’s trustees in that decision and how this ran counter to the decision-making process described to staff by the museum’s outgoing director, Neil MacGregor.
- Key coverage: The Independent, Arts Professional